|
NAMEreflex - fast lexical analyzer generator SYNOPSISreflex [-bcdfhilnpstvwBFILTV78+? -C[aefFmr] -ooutput -Pprefix -Sskeleton] [--help --version] [filename ...] OVERVIEWThis manual describes reflex, a tool for generating programs that perform pattern-matching on text. The manual includes both tutorial and reference sections:
DESCRIPTIONreflex is a tool for generating scanners: programs which recognized lexical patterns in text. reflex reads the given input files, or its standard input if no file names are given, for a description of a scanner to generate. The description is in the form of pairs of regular expressions and C code, called rules. reflex generates as output a C source file, lex.yy.c, which defines a routine yylex(). This file is compiled and linked with the -lrefl library to produce an executable. When the executable is run, it analyzes its input for occurrences of the regular expressions. Whenever it finds one, it executes the corresponding C code. SOME SIMPLE EXAMPLESFirst some simple examples to get the flavor of how one uses reflex. The following reflex input specifies a scanner which whenever it encounters the string “username” will replace it with the user's login name:
By default, any text not matched by a reflex scanner is copied to the output, so the net effect of this scanner is to copy its input file to its output with each occurrence of “username” expanded. In this input, there is just one rule. “username” is the pattern and the “printf” is the action. The "%%" marks the beginning of the rules. Here's another simple example: This scanner counts the number of characters and the number of lines in its input (it produces no output other than the final report on the counts). The first line declares two globals, “num_lines” and “num_chars”, which are accessible both inside yylex() and in the main() routine declared after the second "%%". There are two rules, one which matches a newline ("\n") and increments both the line count and the character count, and one which matches any character other than a newline (indicated by the "." regular expression). A somewhat more complicated example: This is the beginnings of a simple scanner for a language like Pascal. It identifies different types of tokens and reports on what it has seen. The details of this example will be explained in the following sections. FORMAT OF THE INPUT FILEThe reflex input file consists of three sections, separated by a line with just %% in it:
The definitions section contains declarations of simple name definitions to simplify the scanner specification, and declarations of start conditions, which are explained in a later section. Name definitions have the form: The “name” is a word beginning with a letter or an underscore ('_') followed by zero or more letters, digits, '_', or '-' (dash). The definition is taken to begin at the first non-white-space character following the name and continuing to the end of the line. The definition can subsequently be referred to using "{name}", which will expand to "(definition)". For example, defines “DIGIT” to be a regular expression which matches a single digit, and “ID” to be a regular expression which matches a letter followed by zero-or-more letters-or-digits. A subsequent reference to is identical to and matches one-or-more digits followed by a '.' followed by zero-or-more digits. The rules section of the reflex input contains a series of rules of the form: where the pattern must be unindented and the action must begin on the same line. See below for a further description of patterns and actions. Finally, the user code section is simply copied to lex.yy.c verbatim. It is used for companion routines which call or are called by the scanner. The presence of this section is optional; if it is missing, the second %% in the input file may be skipped, too. In the definitions and rules sections, any indented text or text enclosed in %{ and %} is copied verbatim to the output (with the %{}'s removed). The %{}'s must appear unindented on lines by themselves. In the rules section, any indented or %{} text appearing before the first rule may be used to declare variables which are local to the scanning routine and (after the declarations) code which is to be executed whenever the scanning routine is entered. Other indented or %{} text in the rule section is still copied to the output, but its meaning is not well-defined and it may well cause compile-time errors (this feature is present for POSIX compliance; see below for other such features). In the definitions section (but not in the rules section), an unindented comment (i.e., a line beginning with "/*") is also copied verbatim to the output up to the next "*/". PATTERNSThe patterns in the input are written using an extended set of regular expressions. These are:
Note that inside of a character class, all regular expression operators lose their special meaning except escape ('\') and the character class operators, '-', ']', and, at the beginning of the class, '^'. The regular expressions listed above are grouped according to precedence, from highest precedence at the top to lowest at the bottom. Those grouped together have equal precedence. For example, is the same as since the '*' operator has higher precedence than concatenation, and concatenation higher than alternation ('|'). This pattern therefore matches either the string “foo” or the string “ba” followed by zero-or-more r's. To match “foo” or zero-or-more “bar”'s, use: and to match zero-or-more “foo”'s-or-“bar”'s:
In addition to characters and ranges of characters, character classes can also contain character class expressions. These are expressions enclosed inside [: and :] delimiters (which themselves must appear between the '[' and ']' of the character class; other elements may occur inside the character class, too). The valid expressions are: These expressions all designate a set of characters equivalent to the corresponding standard C isXXX function. For example, [:alnum:] designates those characters for which isalnum() returns true - i.e., any alphabetic or numeric. Some systems don't provide isblank(), so reflex defines [:blank:] as a blank or a tab. For example, the following character classes are all equivalent: If your scanner is case-insensitive (the -i flag), then [:upper:] and [:lower:] are equivalent to [:alpha:]. Some notes on patterns:
HOW THE INPUT IS MATCHEDWhen the generated scanner is run, it analyzes its input looking for strings which match any of its patterns. If it finds more than one match, it takes the one matching the most text (for trailing context rules, this includes the length of the trailing part, even though it will then be returned to the input). If it finds two or more matches of the same length, the rule listed first in the reflex input file is chosen. Once the match is determined, the text corresponding to the match (called the token) is made available in the global character pointer yytext, and its length in the global integer yyleng. The action corresponding to the matched pattern is then executed (a more detailed description of actions follows), and then the remaining input is scanned for another match. If no match is found, then the default rule is executed: the next character in the input is considered matched and copied to the standard output. Thus, the simplest legal reflex input is: which generates a scanner that simply copies its input (one character at a time) to its output. Note that yytext can be defined in two different ways: either as a character pointer or as a character array. You can control which definition reflex uses by including one of the special directives %pointer or %array in the first (definitions) section of your reflex input. The default is %pointer, unless you use the -l lex compatibility option, in which case yytext will be an array. The advantage of using %pointer is substantially faster scanning and no buffer overflow when matching very large tokens (unless you run out of dynamic memory). The disadvantage is that you are restricted in how your actions can modify yytext (see the next section), and calls to the unput() function destroys the present contents of yytext, which can be a considerable porting headache when moving between different lex versions. The advantage of %array is that you can then modify yytext to your heart's content, and calls to unput() do not destroy yytext (see below). Furthermore, existing lex programs sometimes access yytext externally using declarations of the form: This definition is erroneous when used with %pointer, but correct for %array. %array defines yytext to be an array of YYLMAX characters, which defaults to a fairly large value. You can change the size by simply #define'ing YYLMAX to a different value in the first section of your reflex input. As mentioned above, with %pointer yytext grows dynamically to accommodate large tokens. While this means your %pointer scanner can accommodate very large tokens (such as matching entire blocks of comments), bear in mind that each time the scanner must resize yytext it also must rescan the entire token from the beginning, so matching such tokens can prove slow. yytext presently does not dynamically grow if a call to unput() results in too much text being pushed back; instead, a run-time error results. Also note that you cannot use %array with C++ scanner classes (the c++ option; see below). ACTIONSEach pattern in a rule has a corresponding action, which can be any arbitrary C statement. The pattern ends at the first non-escaped whitespace character; the remainder of the line is its action. If the action is empty, then when the pattern is matched the input token is simply discarded. For example, here is the specification for a program which deletes all occurrences of "zap me" from its input:
(It will copy all other characters in the input to the output since they will be matched by the default rule.) Here is a program which compresses multiple blanks and tabs down to a single blank, and throws away whitespace found at the end of a line:
If the action contains a '{', then the action spans till the balancing '}' is found, and the action may cross multiple lines. reflex knows about C strings and comments and won't be fooled by braces found within them, but also allows actions to begin with %{ and will consider the action to be all the text up to the next %} (regardless of ordinary braces inside the action). An action consisting solely of a vertical bar ('|') means "same as the action for the next rule." See below for an illustration. Actions can include arbitrary C code, including return statements to return a value to whatever routine called yylex(). Each time yylex() is called it continues processing tokens from where it last left off until it either reaches the end of the file or executes a return. Actions are free to modify yytext except for lengthening it (adding characters to its end--these will overwrite later characters in the input stream). This however does not apply when using %array (see above); in that case, yytext may be freely modified in any way. Actions are free to modify yyleng except they should not do so if the action also includes use of yymore() (see below). There are a number of special directives which can be included within an action:
Two notes regarding use of yymore(). First, yymore() depends on the value of yyleng correctly reflecting the size of the current token, so you must not modify yyleng if you are using yymore(). Second, the presence of yymore() in the scanner's action entails a minor performance penalty in the scanner's matching speed.
Note that yyless is a macro and can only be used in the reflex input file, not from other source files.
An important potential problem when using unput() is that if you are using %pointer (the default), a call to unput() destroys the contents of yytext, starting with its rightmost character and devouring one character to the left with each call. If you need the value of yytext preserved after a call to unput() (as in the above example), you must either first copy it elsewhere, or build your scanner using %array instead (see How The Input Is Matched). Finally, note that you cannot put back EOF to attempt to mark the input stream with an end-of-file.
THE GENERATED SCANNERThe output of reflex is the file lex.yy.c, which contains the scanning routine yylex(), a number of tables used by it for matching tokens, and a number of auxiliary routines and macros. By default, yylex() is declared as follows:
(If your environment supports function prototypes, then it will be "int yylex( void )".) This definition may be changed by defining the “YY_DECL” macro. For example, you could use:
to give the scanning routine the name lexscan, returning a float, and taking two floats as arguments. Note that if you give arguments to the scanning routine using a K&R-style/non-prototyped function declaration, you must terminate the definition with a semi-colon (;). Whenever yylex() is called, it scans tokens from the global input file yyin (which defaults to stdin). It continues until it either reaches an end-of-file (at which point it returns the value 0) or one of its actions executes a return statement. If the scanner reaches an end-of-file, subsequent calls are undefined unless either yyin is pointed at a new input file (in which case scanning continues from that file), or yyrestart() is called. yyrestart() takes one argument, a FILE * pointer (which can be nil, if you've set up YY_INPUT to scan from a source other than yyin), and initializes yyin for scanning from that file. Essentially there is no difference between just assigning yyin to a new input file or using yyrestart() to do so; the latter is available for compatibility with previous versions of reflex, and because it can be used to switch input files in the middle of scanning. It can also be used to throw away the current input buffer, by calling it with an argument of yyin; but better is to use YY_FLUSH_BUFFER (see above). Note that yyrestart() does not reset the start condition to INITIAL (see Start Conditions, below). If yylex() stops scanning due to executing a return statement in one of the actions, the scanner may then be called again and it will resume scanning where it left off. By default (and for purposes of efficiency), the scanner uses block-reads rather than simple getc() calls to read characters from yyin. The nature of how it gets its input can be controlled by defining the YY_INPUT macro. YY_INPUT's calling sequence is "YY_INPUT(buf,result,max_size)". Its action is to place up to max_size characters in the character array buf and return in the integer variable result either the number of characters read or the constant YY_NULL (0 on Unix systems) to indicate EOF. The default YY_INPUT reads from the global file-pointer “yyin”. A sample definition of YY_INPUT (in the definitions section of the input file): This definition will change the input processing to occur one character at a time. When the scanner receives an end-of-file indication from YY_INPUT, it then checks the yywrap() function. If yywrap() returns false (zero), then it is assumed that the function has gone ahead and set up yyin to point to another input file, and scanning continues. If it returns true (non-zero), then the scanner terminates, returning 0 to its caller. Note that in either case, the start condition remains unchanged; it does not revert to INITIAL. If you do not supply your own version of yywrap(), then you must either use %option noyywrap (in which case the scanner behaves as though yywrap() returned 1), or you must link with -lrefl to obtain the default version of the routine, which always returns 1. Three routines are available for scanning from in-memory buffers rather than files: yy_scan_string(), yy_scan_bytes(), and yy_scan_buffer(). See the discussion of them below in the section Multiple Input Buffers. The scanner writes its ECHO output to the yyout global (default, stdout), which may be redefined by the user simply by assigning it to some other FILE pointer. START CONDITIONSReflex provides a mechanism for conditionally activating rules. Any rule whose pattern is prefixed with "<sc>" will only be active when the scanner is in the start condition named “sc”. For example,
will be active only when the scanner is in the “STRING” start condition, and
will be active only when the current start condition is either “INITIAL”, “STRING”, or “QUOTE”. Start conditions are declared in the definitions (first) section of the input using unindented lines beginning with either %s or %x followed by a list of names. The former declares inclusive start conditions, the latter exclusive start conditions. A start condition is activated using the BEGIN action. Until the next BEGIN action is executed, rules with the given start condition will be active and rules with other start conditions will be inactive. If the start condition is inclusive, then rules with no start conditions at all will also be active. If it is exclusive, then only rules qualified with the start condition will be active. A set of rules contingent on the same exclusive start condition describe a scanner which is independent of any of the other rules in the reflex input. Because of this, exclusive start conditions make it easy to specify “mini-scanners” which scan portions of the input that are syntactically different from the rest (e.g., comments). If the distinction between inclusive and exclusive start conditions is still a little vague, here's a simple example illustrating the connection between the two. The set of rules: is equivalent to Without the <INITIAL,example> qualifier, the bar pattern in the second example wouldn't be active (i.e., couldn't match) when in start condition example. If we just used <example> to qualify bar, though, then it would only be active in example and not in INITIAL, while in the first example it's active in both, because in the first example the example starting condition is an inclusive (%s) start condition. Also note that the special start-condition specifier <*> matches every start condition. Thus, the above example could also have been written;
The default rule (to ECHO any unmatched character) remains active in start conditions. It is equivalent to:
BEGIN(0) returns to the original state where only the rules with no start conditions are active. This state can also be referred to as the start-condition “INITIAL”, so BEGIN(INITIAL) is equivalent to BEGIN(0). (The parentheses around the start condition name are not required but are considered good style.) BEGIN actions can also be given as indented code at the beginning of the rules section. For example, the following will cause the scanner to enter the “SPECIAL” start condition whenever yylex() is called and the global variable enter_special is true:
To illustrate the uses of start conditions, here is a scanner which provides two different interpretations of a string like "123.456". By default it will treat it as three tokens:
But if the string is preceded earlier in the line by the string “expect-floats” it will treat it as a single token, the floating-point number 123.456: Here is a scanner which recognizes (and discards) C comments while maintaining a count of the current input line. This scanner goes to a bit of trouble to match as much text as possible with each rule. In general, when attempting to write a high-speed scanner try to match as much possible in each rule, as it's a big win. Note that start-conditions names are really integer values and can be stored as such. Thus, the above could be extended in the following fashion: Furthermore, you can access the current start condition using the integer-valued YY_START macro. For example, the above assignments to comment_caller could instead be written reflex provides YYSTATE as an alias for YY_START (since that is what's used by AT&T lex). Note that start conditions do not have their own name-space; %s's and %x's declare names in the same fashion as #define's. Finally, here's an example of how to match C-style quoted strings using exclusive start conditions, including expanded escape sequences (but not including checking for a string that's too long):
Often, such as in some of the examples above, you wind up writing a whole bunch of rules all preceded by the same start condition(s). reflex makes this a little easier and cleaner by introducing a notion of start condition scope. A start condition scope is begun with: where SCs is a list of one or more start conditions. Inside the start condition scope, every rule automatically has the prefix <SCs> applied to it, until a '}' which matches the initial '{'. So, for example, is equivalent to: Start condition scopes may be nested. Three routines are available for manipulating stacks of start conditions:
The start condition stack grows dynamically and so has no built-in size limitation. If memory is exhausted, program execution aborts. To use start condition stacks, your scanner must include a %option stack directive (see Options below). MULTIPLE INPUT BUFFERSSome scanners (such as those which support “include” files) require reading from several input streams. As reflex scanners do a large amount of buffering, one cannot control where the next input will be read from by simply writing a YY_INPUT which is sensitive to the scanning context. YY_INPUT is only called when the scanner reaches the end of its buffer, which may be a long time after scanning a statement such as an “include” which requires switching the input source. To negotiate these sorts of problems, reflex provides a mechanism for creating and switching between multiple input buffers. An input buffer is created by using: which takes a FILE pointer and a size and creates a buffer associated with the given file and large enough to hold size characters (when in doubt, use YY_BUF_SIZE for the size). It returns a YY_BUFFER_STATE handle, which may then be passed to other routines (see below). The YY_BUFFER_STATE type is a pointer to an opaque struct yy_buffer_state structure, so you may safely initialize YY_BUFFER_STATE variables to ((YY_BUFFER_STATE) 0) if you wish, and also refer to the opaque structure in order to correctly declare input buffers in source files other than that of your scanner. Note that the FILE pointer in the call to yy_create_buffer is only used as the value of yyin seen by YY_INPUT; if you redefine YY_INPUT so it no longer uses yyin, then you can safely pass a nil FILE pointer to yy_create_buffer. You select a particular buffer to scan from using: switches the scanner's input buffer so subsequent tokens will come from new_buffer. Note that yy_switch_to_buffer() may be used by yywrap() to set things up for continued scanning, instead of opening a new file and pointing yyin at it. Note also that switching input sources via either yy_switch_to_buffer() or yywrap() does not change the start condition. is used to reclaim the storage associated with a buffer. (buffer can be nil, in which case the routine does nothing.) You can also clear the current contents of a buffer using: This function discards the buffer's contents, so the next time the scanner attempts to match a token from the buffer, it will first fill the buffer anew using YY_INPUT. yy_new_buffer() is an alias for yy_create_buffer(), provided for compatibility with the C++ use of new and delete for creating and destroying dynamic objects. Finally, the YY_CURRENT_BUFFER macro returns a YY_BUFFER_STATE handle to the current buffer. Here is an example of using these features for writing a scanner which expands include files (the <<EOF>> feature is discussed below): Three routines are available for setting up input buffers for scanning in-memory strings instead of files. All of them create a new input buffer for scanning the string, and return a corresponding YY_BUFFER_STATE handle (which you should delete with yy_delete_buffer() when done with it). They also switch to the new buffer using yy_switch_to_buffer(), so the next call to yylex() will start scanning the string.
Note that both of these functions create and scan a copy of the string or bytes. (This may be desirable, since yylex() modifies the contents of the buffer it is scanning.) You can avoid the copy by using:
END-OF-FILE RULESThe special rule "<<EOF>>" indicates actions which are to be taken when an end-of-file is encountered and yywrap() returns non-zero (i.e., indicates no further files to process). The action must finish by doing one of four things:
<<EOF>> rules may not be used with other patterns; they may only be qualified with a list of start conditions. If an unqualified <<EOF>> rule is given, it applies to all start conditions which do not already have <<EOF>> actions. To specify an <<EOF>> rule for only the initial start condition, use
These rules are useful for catching things like unclosed comments. An example:
MISCELLANEOUS MACROSThe macro YY_USER_ACTION can be defined to provide an action which is always executed prior to the matched rule's action. For example, it could be #define'd to call a routine to convert yytext to lower-case. When YY_USER_ACTION is invoked, the variable yy_act gives the number of the matched rule (rules are numbered starting with 1). Suppose you want to profile how often each of your rules is matched. The following would do the trick:
where ctr is an array to hold the counts for the different rules. Note that the macro YY_NUM_RULES gives the total number of rules (including the default rule, even if you use -s), so a correct declaration for ctr is:
The macro YY_USER_INIT may be defined to provide an action which is always executed before the first scan (and before the scanner's internal initializations are done). For example, it could be used to call a routine to read in a data table or open a logging file. The macro yy_set_interactive(is_interactive) can be used to control whether the current buffer is considered interactive. An interactive buffer is processed more slowly, but must be used when the scanner's input source is indeed interactive to avoid problems due to waiting to fill buffers (see the discussion of the -I flag below). A non-zero value in the macro invocation marks the buffer as interactive, a zero value as non-interactive. Note that use of this macro overrides %option always-interactive or %option never-interactive (see Options below). yy_set_interactive() must be invoked prior to beginning to scan the buffer that is (or is not) to be considered interactive. The macro yy_set_bol(at_bol) can be used to control whether the current buffer's scanning context for the next token match is done as though at the beginning of a line. A non-zero macro argument makes rules anchored with '^' active, while a zero argument makes '^' rules inactive. The macro YY_AT_BOL() returns true if the next token scanned from the current buffer will have '^' rules active, false otherwise. In the generated scanner, the actions are all gathered in one large switch statement and separated using YY_BREAK, which may be redefined. By default, it is simply a “break”, to separate each rule's action from the following rule's. Redefining YY_BREAK allows, for example, C++ users to #define YY_BREAK to do nothing (while being very careful that every rule ends with a “break” or a “return”!) to avoid suffering from unreachable statement warnings where because a rule's action ends with “return”, the YY_BREAK is inaccessible. VALUES AVAILABLE TO THE USERThis section summarizes the various values available to the user in the rule actions.
INTERFACING WITH YACCOne of the main uses of reflex is as a companion to the yacc parser-generator. yacc parsers expect to call a routine named yylex() to find the next input token. The routine is supposed to return the type of the next token as well as putting any associated value in the global yylval. To use reflex with yacc, one specifies the -d option to yacc to instruct it to generate the file y.tab.h containing definitions of all the %tokens appearing in the yacc input. This file is then included in the reflex scanner. For example, if one of the tokens is “TOK_NUMBER”, part of the scanner might look like:
OPTIONSreflex has the following options:
reflex also provides a mechanism for controlling options within the scanner specification itself, rather than from the reflex command-line. This is done by including %option directives in the first section of the scanner specification. You can specify multiple options with a single %option directive, and multiple directives in the first section of your reflex input file. Most options are given simply as names, optionally preceded by the word “no” (with no intervening whitespace) to negate their meaning. A number are equivalent to reflex flags or their negation: Some %option's provide features otherwise not available:
reflex scans your rule actions to determine whether you use the REJECT or yymore() features. The reject and yymore options are available to override its decision as to whether you use the options, either by setting them (e.g., %option reject) to indicate the feature is indeed used, or unsetting them to indicate it actually is not used (e.g., %option noyymore). Three options take string-delimited values, offset with '=': is equivalent to -oABC, and is equivalent to -PXYZ. Finally, only applies when generating a C++ scanner ( -+ option). It informs reflex that you have derived foo as a subclass of yyFlexLexer, so reflex will place your actions in the member function foo::yylex() instead of yyFlexLexer::yylex(). It also generates a yyFlexLexer::yylex() member function that emits a run-time error (by invoking yyFlexLexer::LexerError()) if called. See Generating C++ Scanners, below, for additional information. A number of options are available for lint purists who want to suppress the appearance of unneeded routines in the generated scanner. Each of the following, if unset (e.g., %option nounput ), results in the corresponding routine not appearing in the generated scanner: (though yy_push_state() and friends won't appear anyway unless you use %option stack). PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONSThe main design goal of reflex is that it generate high-performance scanners. It has been optimized for dealing well with large sets of rules. Aside from the effects on scanner speed of the table compression -C options outlined above, there are a number of options/actions which degrade performance. These are, from most expensive to least:
with the first three all being quite expensive and the last two being quite cheap. Note also that unput() is implemented as a routine call that potentially does quite a bit of work, while yyless() is a quite-cheap macro; so if just putting back some excess text you scanned, use yyless(). REJECT should be avoided at all costs when performance is important. It is a particularly expensive option. Getting rid of backing up is messy and often may be an enormous amount of work for a complicated scanner. In principal, one begins by using the -b flag to generate a lex.backup file. For example, on the input the file looks like: The first few lines tell us that there's a scanner state in which it can make a transition on an 'o' but not on any other character, and that in that state the currently scanned text does not match any rule. The state occurs when trying to match the rules found at lines 2 and 3 in the input file. If the scanner is in that state and then reads something other than an 'o', it will have to back up to find a rule which is matched. With a bit of headscratching one can see that this must be the state it's in when it has seen “fo”. When this has happened, if anything other than another 'o' is seen, the scanner will have to back up to simply match the 'f' (by the default rule). The comment regarding State #8 indicates there's a problem when “foob” has been scanned. Indeed, on any character other than an 'a', the scanner will have to back up to accept “foo”. Similarly, the comment for State #9 concerns when “fooba” has been scanned and an 'r' does not follow. The final comment reminds us that there's no point going to all the trouble of removing backing up from the rules unless we're using -Cf or -CF, since there's no performance gain doing so with compressed scanners. The way to remove the backing up is to add “error” rules:
Eliminating backing up among a list of keywords can also be done using a “catch-all” rule: This is usually the best solution when appropriate. Backing up messages tend to cascade. With a complicated set of rules it's not uncommon to get hundreds of messages. If one can decipher them, though, it often only takes a dozen or so rules to eliminate the backing up (though it's easy to make a mistake and have an error rule accidentally match a valid token. A possible future reflex feature will be to automatically add rules to eliminate backing up). It's important to keep in mind that you gain the benefits of eliminating backing up only if you eliminate every instance of backing up. Leaving just one means you gain nothing. Variable trailing context (where both the leading and trailing parts do not have a fixed length) entails almost the same performance loss as REJECT (i.e., substantial). So when possible a rule like: is better written: or as Note that here the special '|' action does not provide any savings, and can even make things worse (see Deficiencies / Bugs below). Another area where the user can increase a scanner's performance (and one that's easier to implement) arises from the fact that the longer the tokens matched, the faster the scanner will run. This is because with long tokens the processing of most input characters takes place in the (short) inner scanning loop, and does not often have to go through the additional work of setting up the scanning environment (e.g., yytext) for the action. Recall the scanner for C comments: This could be sped up by writing it as: Now instead of each newline requiring the processing of another action, recognizing the newlines is “distributed” over the other rules to keep the matched text as long as possible. Note that adding rules does not slow down the scanner! The speed of the scanner is independent of the number of rules or (modulo the considerations given at the beginning of this section) how complicated the rules are with regard to operators such as '*' and '|'. A final example in speeding up a scanner: suppose you want to scan through a file containing identifiers and keywords, one per line and with no other extraneous characters, and recognize all the keywords. A natural first approach is: To eliminate the back-tracking, introduce a catch-all rule: Now, if it's guaranteed that there's exactly one word per line, then we can reduce the total number of matches by a half by merging in the recognition of newlines with that of the other tokens: One has to be careful here, as we have now reintroduced backing up into the scanner. In particular, while we know that there will never be any characters in the input stream other than letters or newlines, reflex can't figure this out, and it will plan for possibly needing to back up when it has scanned a token like “auto” and then the next character is something other than a newline or a letter. Previously it would then just match the “auto” rule and be done, but now it has no “auto” rule, only a "auto\n" rule. To eliminate the possibility of backing up, we could either duplicate all rules but without final newlines, or, since we never expect to encounter such an input and therefore don't how it's classified, we can introduce one more catch-all rule, this one which doesn't include a newline: Compiled with -Cf, this is about as fast as one can get a reflex scanner to go for this particular problem. A final note: reflex is slow when matching NUL's, particularly when a token contains multiple NUL's. It's best to write rules which match short amounts of text if it's anticipated that the text will often include NUL's. Another final note regarding performance: as mentioned above in the section How the Input is Matched, dynamically resizing yytext to accommodate huge tokens is a slow process because it presently requires that the (huge) token be rescanned from the beginning. Thus if performance is vital, you should attempt to match “large” quantities of text but not “huge” quantities, where the cutoff between the two is at about 8K characters/token. GENERATING C++ SCANNERSreflex provides two different ways to generate scanners for use with C++. The first way is to simply compile a scanner generated by reflex using a C++ compiler instead of a C compiler. You should not encounter any compilations errors (please report any you find to the email address given in the Author section below). You can then use C++ code in your rule actions instead of C code. Note that the default input source for your scanner remains yyin, and default echoing is still done to yyout. Both of these remain FILE * variables and not C++ streams. You can also use reflex to generate a C++ scanner class, using the -+ option (or, equivalently, %option c++), which is automatically specified if the name of the reflex executable ends in a '+', such as reflex++. When using this option, reflex defaults to generating the scanner to the file lex.yy.cc instead of lex.yy.c. The generated scanner includes the header file reFlexLexer.h, which defines the interface to two C++ classes. The first class, FlexLexer, provides an abstract base class defining the general scanner class interface. It provides the following member functions:
Also provided are member functions equivalent to yy_switch_to_buffer(), yy_create_buffer() (though the first argument is an istream* object pointer and not a FILE*), yy_flush_buffer(), yy_delete_buffer(), and yyrestart() (again, the first argument is a istream* object pointer). The second class defined in reFlexLexer.h is yyFlexLexer, which is derived from FlexLexer. It defines the following additional member functions:
In addition, yyFlexLexer defines the following protected virtual functions which you can redefine in derived classes to tailor the scanner:
Note that a yyFlexLexer object contains its entire scanning state. Thus you can use such objects to create reentrant scanners. You can instantiate multiple instances of the same yyFlexLexer class, and you can also combine multiple C++ scanner classes together in the same program using the -P option discussed above. Finally, note that the %array feature is not available to C++ scanner classes; you must use %pointer (the default). Here is an example of a simple C++ scanner: If you want to create multiple (different) lexer classes, you use the -P flag (or the prefix= option) to rename each yyFlexLexer to some other xxFlexLexer. You then can include <reFlexLexer.h> in your other sources once per lexer class, first renaming yyFlexLexer as follows: if, for example, you used %option prefix="xx" for one of your scanners and %option prefix="zz" for the other. IMPORTANT: the present form of the scanning class is experimental and may change considerably between major releases. INCOMPATIBILITIES WITH LEX AND POSIXreflex is a rewrite of the AT&T Unix lex tool (the two implementations do not share any code, though), with some extensions and incompatibilities, both of which are of concern to those who wish to write scanners acceptable to either implementation. reflex is fully compliant with the POSIX lex specification, except that when using %pointer (the default), a call to unput() destroys the contents of yytext, which is counter to the POSIX specification. In this section we discuss all of the known areas of incompatibility between reflex, AT&T lex, and the POSIX specification. reflex's -l option turns on maximum compatibility with the original AT&T lex implementation, at the cost of a major loss in the generated scanner's performance. We note below which incompatibilities can be overcome using the -l option. reflex is fully compatible with lex with the following exceptions:
The following reflex features are not included in lex or the POSIX specification: plus almost all of the reflex flags. The last feature in the list refers to the fact that with reflex you can put multiple actions on the same line, separated with semi-colons, while with lex, the following is (rather surprisingly) truncated to reflex does not truncate the action. Actions that are not enclosed in braces are simply terminated at the end of the line. DIAGNOSTICSwarning, rule cannot be matched indicates that the given rule cannot be matched because it follows other rules that will always match the same text as it. For example, in the following “foo” cannot be matched because it comes after an identifier “catch-all” rule:
Using REJECT in a scanner suppresses this warning. warning, -s option given but default rule can be matched means that it is possible (perhaps only in a particular start condition) that the default rule (match any single character) is the only one that will match a particular input. Since -s was given, presumably this is not intended. reject_used_but_not_detected undefined or yymore_used_but_not_detected undefined - These errors can occur at compile time. They indicate that the scanner uses REJECT or yymore() but that reflex failed to notice the fact, meaning that reflex scanned the first two sections looking for occurrences of these actions and failed to find any, but somehow you snuck some in (via a #include file, for example). Use %option reject or %option yymore to indicate to reflex that you really do use these features. reflex scanner jammed - a scanner compiled with -s has encountered an input string which wasn't matched by any of its rules. This error can also occur due to internal problems. token too large, exceeds YYLMAX - your scanner uses %array and one of its rules matched a string longer than the YYLMAX constant (8K bytes by default). You can increase the value by #define'ing YYLMAX in the definitions section of your reflex input. scanner requires -8 flag to use the character 'x' - Your scanner specification includes recognizing the 8-bit character 'x' and you did not specify the -8 flag, and your scanner defaulted to 7-bit because you used the -Cf or -CF table compression options. See the discussion of the -7 flag for details. reflex scanner push-back overflow - you used unput() to push back so much text that the scanner's buffer could not hold both the pushed-back text and the current token in yytext. Ideally the scanner should dynamically resize the buffer in this case, but at present it does not. input buffer overflow, can't enlarge buffer because scanner uses REJECT - the scanner was working on matching an extremely large token and needed to expand the input buffer. This doesn't work with scanners that use REJECT. fatal reflex scanner internal error--end of buffer missed - This can occur in an scanner which is reentered after a long-jump has jumped out (or over) the scanner's activation frame. Before reentering the scanner, use: or, as noted above, switch to using the C++ scanner class. too many start conditions in <> construct! - you listed more start conditions in a <> construct than exist (so you must have listed at least one of them twice). FILES
DEFICIENCIES / BUGSSome trailing context patterns cannot be properly matched and generate warning messages ("dangerous trailing context"). These are patterns where the ending of the first part of the rule matches the beginning of the second part, such as "zx*/xy*", where the 'x*' matches the 'x' at the beginning of the trailing context. (Note that the POSIX draft states that the text matched by such patterns is undefined.) For some trailing context rules, parts which are actually fixed-length are not recognized as such, leading to the abovementioned performance loss. In particular, parts using '|' or {n} (such as "foo{3}") are always considered variable-length. Combining trailing context with the special '|' action can result in fixed trailing context being turned into the more expensive variable trailing context. For example, in the following:
Use of unput() invalidates yytext and yyleng, unless the %array directive or the -l option has been used. Pattern-matching of NUL's is substantially slower than matching other characters. Dynamic resizing of the input buffer is slow, as it entails rescanning all the text matched so far by the current (generally huge) token. Due to both buffering of input and read-ahead, you cannot intermix calls to <stdio.h> routines, such as, for example, getchar(), with reflex rules and expect it to work. Call input() instead. The total table entries listed by the -v flag excludes the number of table entries needed to determine what rule has been matched. The number of entries is equal to the number of DFA states if the scanner does not use REJECT, and somewhat greater than the number of states if it does. REJECT cannot be used with the -f or -F options. The reflex internal algorithms need documentation. SEE ALSOlex(1), yacc(1), sed(1), awk(1). John Levine, Tony Mason, and Doug Brown, Lex & Yacc, O'Reilly and Associates. Be sure to get the 2nd edition. M. E. Lesk and E. Schmidt, LEX - Lexical Analyzer Generator Alfred Aho, Ravi Sethi and Jeffrey Ullman, Compilers: Principles, Techniques and Tools, Addison-Wesley (1986). Describes the pattern-matching techniques used by reflex (deterministic finite automata). AUTHORVern Paxson, with the help of many ideas and much inspiration from Van Jacobson. Original version by Jef Poskanzer. The fast table representation is a partial implementation of a design done by Van Jacobson. The implementation was done by Kevin Gong and Vern Paxson. Thanks to the many reflex beta-testers, feedbackers, and contributors, especially Francois Pinard, Casey Leedom, Robert Abramovitz, Stan Adermann, Terry Allen, David Barker-Plummer, John Basrai, Neal Becker, Nelson H.F. Beebe, benson@odi.com, Karl Berry, Peter A. Bigot, Simon Blanchard, Keith Bostic, Frederic Brehm, Ian Brockbank, Kin Cho, Nick Christopher, Brian Clapper, J.T. Conklin, Jason Coughlin, Bill Cox, Nick Cropper, Dave Curtis, Scott David Daniels, Chris G. Demetriou, Theo Deraadt, Mike Donahue, Chuck Doucette, Tom Epperly, Leo Eskin, Chris Faylor, Chris Flatters, Jon Forrest, Jeffrey Friedl, Joe Gayda, Kaveh R. Ghazi, Wolfgang Glunz, Eric Goldman, Christopher M. Gould, Ulrich Grepel, Peer Griebel, Jan Hajic, Charles Hemphill, NORO Hideo, Jarkko Hietaniemi, Scott Hofmann, Jeff Honig, Dana Hudes, Eric Hughes, John Interrante, Ceriel Jacobs, Michal Jaegermann, Sakari Jalovaara, Jeffrey R. Jones, Henry Juengst, Klaus Kaempf, Jonathan I. Kamens, Terrence O Kane, Amir Katz, ken@ken.hilco.com, Kevin B. Kenny, Steve Kirsch, Winfried Koenig, Marq Kole, Ronald Lamprecht, Greg Lee, Rohan Lenard, Craig Leres, John Levine, Steve Liddle, David Loffredo, Mike Long, Mohamed el Lozy, Brian Madsen, Malte, Joe Marshall, Bengt Martensson, Chris Metcalf, Luke Mewburn, Jim Meyering, R. Alexander Milowski, Erik Naggum, G.T. Nicol, Landon Noll, James Nordby, Marc Nozell, Richard Ohnemus, Karsten Pahnke, Sven Panne, Roland Pesch, Walter Pelissero, Gaumond Pierre, Esmond Pitt, Jef Poskanzer, Joe Rahmeh, Jarmo Raiha, Frederic Raimbault, Pat Rankin, Rick Richardson, Kevin Rodgers, Kai Uwe Rommel, Jim Roskind, Alberto Santini, Andreas Scherer, Darrell Schiebel, Raf Schietekat, Doug Schmidt, Philippe Schnoebelen, Andreas Schwab, Larry Schwimmer, Alex Siegel, Eckehard Stolz, Jan-Erik Strvmquist, Mike Stump, Paul Stuart, Dave Tallman, Ian Lance Taylor, Chris Thewalt, Richard M. Timoney, Jodi Tsai, Paul Tuinenga, Gary Weik, Frank Whaley, Gerhard Wilhelms, Kent Williams, Ken Yap, Ron Zellar, Nathan Zelle, David Zuhn, and those whose names have slipped my marginal mail-archiving skills but whose contributions are appreciated all the same. Thanks to Keith Bostic, Jon Forrest, Noah Friedman, John Gilmore, Craig Leres, John Levine, Bob Mulcahy, G.T. Nicol, Francois Pinard, Rich Salz, and Richard Stallman for help with various distribution headaches. Thanks to Esmond Pitt and Earle Horton for 8-bit character support; to Benson Margulies and Fred Burke for C++ support; to Kent Williams and Tom Epperly for C++ class support; to Ove Ewerlid for support of NUL's; and to Eric Hughes for support of multiple buffers. This work was primarily done when I was with the Real Time Systems Group at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory in Berkeley, CA. Many thanks to all there for the support I received. Send comments to vern@ee.lbl.gov.
|